Alzheimer Prevention: Risk Down by 35 to 82%

(Last Updated On: January 23, 2017)

Alzheimer prevention Blueberry netalloy adj 200pxScience Fact: Alzheimer prevention has been the goal of many researchers, but progress has been frustratingly slow. Two new studies report Alzheimer risk reduced by 35% to 82%, truly astounding results on the road to a cure for this disease.

Spoiler alert: Blueberries may help prevent Alzheimers disease! Additional material on blueberries added January 2017, near the bottom of this blog.

The first study used a new drug to prevent the deterioration of Alzheimer patients who already had the disease; the second study looked at dietary regimens that seem to prevent the onset of Alzheimers, with a notable emphasis on blueberries.

Alzheimer Prevention via Drugs – Stabilization of Mental Function

The use of drugs to arrest the progress of Alzheimer disease got a big boost March 20 at an Alzheimer/Parkinson disease conference in Nice, France. Dr. Jeffrey Sevigny and four other researchers from Biogen Idec, a biotech company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, reported the results of treating Alzheimers patients with the aducanumab, a drug that has previously been known as BIIB037. (BIIB is the company’s ticker symbol on NASDAQ.)

The researchers studied 166 volunteers with mild Alzheimer disease, 50 to 90 years old. Every four weeks for a year, each received an intravenous injection. The patients were divided into five test groups, which were randomly assigned to receive doses of 1, 3, 6, or 10 mg/kg of the drug, or a placebo. Every six months, patients were tested for quantity of amyloid plaque in six regions of the brain. They were also given standardized tests to measure dementia.

Patients receiving the placebo and the lowest dose of aducanumab showed no significant reduction in amyloid plaque, and their brain function declined as their disease progressed. However, all the higher doses led to decreases in plaque and reductions in dementia symptoms. The higher the dose, the greater the improvements. The overall effectiveness in combatting Alzheimers was as high as 70% or 82% depending on your news source. AlzForum reported that an audience of 2,500 was rapt with attention as they heard that “after one year, the 10 mg dose appears to have pulled most amyloid from the brain,” and that this high dose appeared to arrest further mental deterioration.

Some patients suffered a side effect of localized swelling in the brain, especially at the highest drug dose. There is a genetic variant called “ApoE epsilon 4” that makes some people more vulnerable to Alzheimer disease; test subjects with this gene were especially likely to suffer this side effect at high dose.

The researchers conservatively described their study as a Phase Ib clinical study, which confirms that a drug is safe. However, their work also combines elements of a Phase 2 study, which tests whether the drug is effective. The results are so significant that the company plans to immediately begin recruiting patients for a Phase III study. This will likely involve more than a thousand patients and their personal physicians, and will occur in parallel as the company files for regulatory approval. This progress is so convincing that Biogen’s stock has risen substantially since early December, when this work began to be reported.

Alzheimer Prevention via Diet – Dietary Avoidance Strategies

OK, so there’s dramatically promising progress in the use of drugs to prevent the worsening of Alzheimer symptoms. But there’s also good news in the use of diet to prevent Alzheimer disease.

Diet becomes particularly significant for Alzheimer prevention when we consider the types of Alzheimer disease:
– Familial Alzheimer Disease is entirely inherited; it tends to occur early in life, before age 50, and constitutes 1% of all Alzheimer cases.
– Early-onset Alzheimers occurs slightly later in life and is associated with a defect on chromosome 14; it affects less than 10% of all Alzheimer patients.
– Late-onset Alzheimers occurs after age 65 and is by far the most common type. It makes up the remaining 90% of all cases. In this dominant form of the disease, “genetic factors are small, but diet is important.”

Thus researchers have come to regard diet as potentially the key tool in Alzheimer prevention for the most common type of Alzheimer disease.

The new anti-Alzheimer diet results come from a study at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago. The lead author is Prof. Martha Clare Morris, with co-authors from Rush University plus Prof. Frank Sacks of the Harvard School of Public Health.

The researchers studied 923 volunteers aged 58 to 98 years and followed their progress for an average of 4.5 years. The patients were asked to regularly report on the foods they ate or avoided, and their mental functioning was measured.

The study was designed to test the effectiveness of three different diets that have been advocated to promote neurological and cardiovascular health:
– The DASH Diet (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) is advocated by the National Institutes of Health and USDA for heart health and general well-being. It emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains and low-fat dairy foods; includes meat, fish, poultry, nuts and beans; and limits sugar-sweetened foods and beverages, red meat and added fats.
– The Mediterranean Diet emphasizes high consumption of olive oil, legumes, unrefined cereals, fruits and vegetables; moderate consumption of fish, dairy products (mostly as cheese and yogurt) and wine; and low consumption of meat and meat products.
– The MIND Diet (Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) was developed by Prof Morris and her colleagues to slow the onset of dementia; it combines elements of the DASH and Mediterranean diets, plus berries, especially blueberries. Blueberries have been shown to have many medical benefits, including brain health. The MIND diet emphasizes whole grains, a salad, a vegetable and a glass of wine every day; it advocates snacking on nuts and berries; and eating beans, poultry and fish every week. Dieters must limit butter, cheese and fast food.

The diets followed by the volunteers were scored as to how closely they matched the DASH, Mediterranean and MIND diets. During the study, among the approximately 1000 volunteers, 144 cases of Alzheimers were diagnosed.

It turned out that among those whose diets closely matched one of the three diets, the incidence of Alzheimers was greatly reduced – by 39% for DASH, by 54% by Mediterranean and by 53% for MIND.

However, few people have the discipline to adhere to any of these strict diet plans, which seem designed to take the fun out of eating. Therefore, it’s important to know what happens when people only follow a dietary plan “part way.” In the case of the DASH and Mediterranean diets, those who adhered to the diets only “moderately” experienced no significant Alzheimer prevention. However, those who moderately matched the MIND diet had a 35% lower risk of contracting Alzheimers.

This is a marvelous result: it suggests that a less-than-superhuman obsession with what you eat can still yield significant benefits in maintaining good health. If that inspires you to try the MIND diet yourself, the diet is explained at various levels of detail by Rush University, Alzheimers News Today and Yahoo.

Science Speculation: One of the fascinating things about research results is that they’re unpredictable. Most progress in science arises as the cumulative effect of many small advances made in thousands of studies. Sometimes, an insightful idea will allow a gigantic leap forward. And once in a while an experiment will produce results so dramatic that they challenge our fundamental ideas.

That is the case with the two Alzheimer prevention studies described above. The researchers themselves probably hoped for, and perhaps even expected, great results. But for the rest of the scientific community, the effectiveness of Alzheimer prevention shown is startling and will strongly influence future work.

Careful Experimental Design Wins the Prize

The Alzheimer prevention shown by the drug aducanumab illustrates how the design of the research project may pre-determine its success or failure.

Aducanumab is not the first drug that has been proposed for Alzheimer prevention, by slowing the buildup of amyloid plaques in the brain. As pointed out by some news reports, similar drugs such as solanezumab, bapineuzumab, gantenerumab and crenezumab performed much more poorly in previous trials. The key difference in the case of aducanumab seems to be that Biogen used PET brain scans to confirm that patients actually had amyloid plaques before enrolling them in the study.

This extra step required additional effort and expense, but really paid off. By excluding 20% to 30% of patients who had dementia symptoms but not specifically Alzheimers, Biogen was able to see a much larger effect from the drug, as well as improve the statistical significance of their results.

This amazing demonstration of the value of careful experimental design and the merit of investing “up front” in the study will probably inspire a re-examination of other Alzheimer prevention drugs. Thus Biogen has not only shown the value of its own drug, it has demonstrated a better pathway for testing competing drugs as well. The increased competition should lead to even more effective Alzheimer prevention therapies.

Modest Diet Changes Could Have Immense Effects

The MIND dietary study shows two significant results: that a complete diet regimen may have a dramatic effect on Alzheimer prevention, and more surprisingly, that even small tweaks in the diet can bring great benefits.

As usual, we must caution that the researchers have shown correlation, but not proved causation (à la previous blogs on Slow Food and Raisin Diet). What Alzheimer patients report eating allows us to predict the future progress of their disease. That doesn’t yet prove that people who purposely change their diets will achieve Alzheimer prevention – that would be the next step in figuring out an Alzheimer therapy.

The significant Alzheimer protection associated with close adherence to any of the diets is impressive in itself. For example, the roughly 50% reduction in risk exceeds the results obtained using dietary changes for prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. However, also significant is the substantial (35%) risk reduction associated with simply a moderate adherence to one of the three diets studied.

Since this is the Science Speculation section, I am free to speculate with you as to the possible meaning of these results. I looked over the “eat this, don’t eat that” guidelines associated with the MIND, DASH and Mediterranean diets and found the following:
– The following restrictions are unique to the MIND diet:
Eat berries; Avoid pastries & sweets, fried/fast food and cheese.
Use olive oil as your primary cooking oil.
– The following restrictions are contained in both the MIND diet and one other diet:
Eat nuts, poultry, and wine; Avoid red meats.
– The following restrictions are common to all three diets:
Eat vegetables, beans, whole grains and fish.

Until we know more, I suggest that anyone interested in Alzheimer prevention consider this advice:
– Favor the “healthy” eating habits that we hear everywhere around us: vegies, whole grains, legumes (beans, lentils, peas), fish, poultry, olive oil, nuts and wine.
– Give your diet an extra boost by snacking on berries, especially blueberries, while trying to avoid pastries & candy, fried or fast food, and cheese. Preferably, make those berries organic, because berries are a frequent headliner on the Dirty Dozen pesticide list (see the Organic Food discussion in an earlier blog).
– Exercise, get enough sleep and be happy!

Alzheimer prevention Blueberry glitch

Diet appears to be an important factor in Alzheimer prevention. Are you ready to stock your fridge with blueberries and nuts, and cut down those forbidden treats?

Note added January 2017:

Does that gigantic drawing of blueberries make your tongue tingle? Read on!

I just received an e-mail from Jacky Miller at jenreviews.com pointing me to her blog post on the ten health benefits of blueberries, plus four recipes using blueberries. You may enjoy reading it HERE.

Jacky’s blueberry pie recipe in turn inspired me to share with you Nola’s great recipe for blueberry pizza. (Yes, you heard right, and no, it’s not a main course, it’s a dessert). Here it is for your enjoyment (click the image to enlarge it):

Alzheimer prevention

Drawing Credit: “netalloy” and “glitch,” on openclipart.org

Comments

Alzheimer Prevention: Risk Down by 35 to 82% — 3 Comments

  1. You’re right, Charles, and the breathless reports on aducanumab chose not to discuss the ethical side of continued testing. Certainly, by skipping Phase 2 the company is moving to accelerate general approval of the drug, although they have economic reasons to do that as well.

    In the present case, it might be possible to design an experimental protocol in which patients whose measured amyloid plaque increased to a certain level would be removed from the study and placed into a separate program in which all patients received the drug on an experimental basis. Then the only subjects retained in the clinical study would be those below the threshold level of plaque, whether or not they were receiving the drug.

    If it’s true that aducanumab removes existing plaque, it may be possible to reverse Alzheimers with high doses of the drug. If so, that would ameliorate the negative consequences of taking part in the study but not receiving the drug.

    I imagine that when recruiting for such a study, the researchers provide considerable counseling to participants and their families to help control expectations. Of course, they are free not to sign up if they fear the emotional devastation that you describe.

    • I don’t think the experts have yet decided conclusively whether the “plaques” or the “tangles” are the major cause of the deterioration associated with Alzheimer’s. Both seem to be present in someone attacked by this disease, but one symptom may be the side-effect of the other, or both could be the result of some as-yet-to-be-identified agent.

      Regardless of the causation mechanism, the brain itself shrinks and degrades through the course of this disease, losing neuron connections as well as grey/white matter in the brain. If you remove the symptoms (even if they are the true cause of Alzheimer’s) it still wouldn’t restore the brain to its original state … once lost, mental capacity and/or memories are unlikely to return even if the symptoms were to be completely removed.

      That’s what increases the urgency for anyone dealing with Alzheimer’s … every day sees the gradual and likely irreversible destruction of the person who once existed. Depending on how early they begin, treatments which reverse the symptoms of Alzheimer’s may occur too late to leave the person in a state where they can live independently with a functional set of memories and skills.

      That one-way characteristic of this disease is what would make it difficult to control the expectations of anyone participating in a study, no matter what they agreed to in the beginning, if they felt a “silver bullet” was available that would halt the relentless progression they were otherwise facing.

  2. One of the most difficult aspects of pursuing a line of research involving patients with double-blind studies is when a particular treatment appears to be a significant breakthrough in the face of a terrible illness. The resulting ethical conflict can sidetrack proper research and lead to undesirable consequences if the study program comes to a premature end. In the case of aducanumab, a 70% or greater improvement (if it can be verified and without negative consequences) would be a stunning breakthrough where no alternatives presently seem to exist. To a desperate family at risk of losing a loved one, being on the “wrong end” of such a study would be heartbreaking, but also unacceptable if they thought the decline could have been arrested.

    The threat is that public pressure to terminate the study and begin using the treatment without delay can be overwhelming in a case like this. But prematurely halting the study might fail to reveal weaknesses in the drug or treatment that would qualify or even seriously degrade the initial positive results.

    I don’t know how to resolve that dilemma .. I just know it exists. The “greater good” argument works until it applies to our own lives, and then it becomes unacceptable for most of us except for those who are altruistically-blessed.