Note Added May 2018: Political rants inspired this post in June 2015. This seems a good time to re-publish it. The midterm election season is warming up, and emotional, insulting speech is already circulating. Once again, it’s time for each of us to calm the fires of passion that needlessly add to political polarization.
Science Fact. Political rants are one of the downsides of the enhanced communications that the Internet, e-mail and social media make possible. We scan the news, the jokes, the family photos and the joys and sorrows of our friends and they help us be happy. However, we unavoidably encounter spam, phishing e-mails and political rants.
The post on this website titled STEM Education #2: Politics Trumps Science summarized research showing that people’s political opinions overwhelm any objective consideration of facts.
Here’s one result from the research. If you have friends who span the political spectrum, two things will happen:
– Friends with whom you don’t agree on some political issue will sometimes come out with stuff that to you sounds completely irrational.
– And conversely, some of the things you say will sound just as off-the-wall to them.
I’m sure that your friends are not stupid people. However, they have allied with a group. By analogy, they are members of a clan. They have the obligation – and are proud – to wear the correct tartan. This effect helps explain why people whom you love and respect will sometimes forward or even write stuff that you think unworthy of them.
Scientists are not immune to this group-driven behavior – they too behave irrationally with respect to politicized issues. In fact, scientists are bigger chumps than non-scientists! The research referenced above shows that numerically literate people use their analytical skills in a biased way, to prove what they already believe. Thus their ability to think logically betrays them, leading them astray.
Science Speculation. No doubt we each have our favorite peeves that interfere when we want to be happy. Two of mine are emotionally charged wordsand personal insults. We find them stuffed like walnuts in a fruitcake, into what pretends to be a thoughtful discussion of an important national or international issue. I will not insult your intelligence or stir up your anxiety by giving examples of emotional “trigger words.” I’m sure you can think of those phrases that cause you to breathe more heavily as your body prepares for battle. Those emotional and insulting additions activate my Rant Detector. As a result, I no longer want to read the article, whether I agree with its conclusions or not.
What do I mean by a political rant? The dictionary pegs “rant” as talking in a noisy or excited way or scolding vehemently, in a bombastic (pompous) manner. And “political” of course references the actions and policies of government. Although it often features altruism, politics is at heart a struggle for power over others. However, a political rant is an aggressive assertion of superiority that often includes demeaning one’s opponents.
Political rants are not going to go away – quite to the contrary. Human beings join a group or tribe in order to survive in a hostile world, and political rants are essential behavior in many social groups.
However, emotions are not binary – they can occur at any level of intensity. Political rants raise the stakes, inflame passions and influence behavior. Past rants may have contributed to the polarization and deadlock in U.S. politics today.
How can the fires be turned down? Shall we turn to folk wisdom?
“Music hath charms to soothe the savage breast.”
Or how about the Bible?
“A gentle answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.”
I see no evidence that either music or wimpy responses calm political passions. However, it’s certainly true that harsh words intensify them. Instead, I vote with La Fontaine:
“Patience and time do more than strength or passion.” (Patience et longueur de temps / Font plus que force ni que rage)
So perhaps the cure for dysfunctional polarization is the passage of time. Meanwhile, I say that we as individuals should let the fire burn itself out, and try not to add more fuel. That assertion is the heart of what I am about to propose.
The current election season is an appropriate time to present my personal Declaration of Independence from Political Rants:
from Political Rants
- Excessive polarization in public dialogue damages the United States by preventing intelligent discussion and the building of consensus.
- I will ignore messages from both the left and the right that use emotional language or personal attacks to advance a political position.
- I will not read, write, forward or save e-mails that denigrate another person.
- In addition, I will block political rants and, where necessary, their authors from my social media.
- I will support thoughtful comments on all subjects, including national and international issues.
- I will try to avoid bias in my comments.
There’s no particular reason that you, dear reader, would be irritated by exactly the same things that bother me. But just in case you find resonance in these words, here they are as a JPG that you are welcome to download and share as you will:
I wish you an election season free of political rants, and rich with thoughtful discourse!
Font Credit: UnifrakturMaguntia, by ‘mach’ wost on Google Fonts
Good one Art!
Generally speaking, I find there are two kinds of rants. One is felt from the heart by the person making the rant, and is an expression of significant (usually negative) emotion. The other is a logical rant, which almost always is expressed to accomplish some purpose. Quite often a logical rant is an attempt to manipulate or intimidate someone or some group into doing or not doing something, directly benefiting the “rantor”.
In the first case, I find there is no purpose in responding to the person ranting on an emotional level. One outcome is a stalemate, like the trenches in World War 1 with both parties refusing to budge and hardening their positions so they can never be changed. The other outcome is mounting hostilities in which emotional “bombs” are lobbed into the other camp trying to dislodge the other party from their position (which hardly ever happens). To the extent damage is done then any relationship between the parties is damaged as well, usually permanently.
In the second case, ranting on a logical level is more like swordplay, with the advantage going to the more verbally-skilled party, rather than anything relating to the issues involved. Besides, in today’s world of blogs and Internet articles, far too many of the exchanges are one-way, giving no option for dialog or reason that could allow fair expression.
No, in today’s world I am in agreement with your philosophy of not participating in rants of any type. It is not a level playing field in most cases anyway, with all parties able to express their opinions in any way that will turn out to be educational or useful. Perhaps the ultimate model of how to deal with such situations is the same that WOPR in the 1983 movie War Games was led to conclude … the only sensible strategy when it comes to nuclear war (or modern rants) is to refuse to play.